![]() ![]() (green = analog model, red = 5th order filter, black = 6th order filter, small window shows the difference of responses when approaching the Nyqvist frequency) Here are coefficients for 5th and 6th order filters (fs=48kHz) I prepared using separate HPF (c2d)) and LPF (MIM):Ĥth order HPF, 1st order LPF: Ĥth order HPF, 2nd order LPF: Īnd a plot showing comparison against their analog model: The error shows a typical least squares behavior. The right-hand figure shows the approximation error, defined as the absolute value of the difference of the magnitude responses. The left figure shows that one can't see any difference between the logarithmic plots of the analog and the digital frequency responses. Note that both plots go up to Nyquist ($24$ kHz). It's a least squares approximation based on the equation error method, and I might write up all the details some day.īelow is a plot of the design result. The design procedure is a heuristic iterative procedure I came up with some time ago. I chose a sampling frequency of $48$ kHz. However this method suffers from extreme warping near nyquist (even when the analog poles/zeros are pre-warped):įigure 1: A-weighting frequency response comparison where the sample rate is $25600\textrm$$ One method is to use the bilinear transform (BLT) to convert the analog filter to the digital filter (as done here Applying A-weighting). But there's no definition for a digital filter. An appropriate implementation of the FIR calculations can exploit that property to double the filter's efficiency.I want to A-weight a time series with arbitrary sample rate.Īn analog A-weighting filter is defined exactly by IEC 61672-1. The product with the window function does not alter the zeros, so almost half of the coefficients of the final impulse response are zero. The window design method is also advantageous for creating efficient half-band filters, because the corresponding sinc function is zero at every other sample point (except the center one). In general, that method will not achieve the minimum possible filter order, but it is particularly convenient for automated applications that require dynamic, on-the-fly, filter design. Another method is to restrict the solution set to the parametric family of Kaiser windows, which provides closed form relationships between the time-domain and frequency domain parameters. Continuing backward to an impulse response can be done by iterating a filter design program to find the minimum filter order. Working backward, one can specify the slope (or width) of the tapered region ( transition band) and the height of the ripples, and thereby derive the frequency-domain parameters of an appropriate window function. The result of the frequency domain convolution is that the edges of the rectangle are tapered, and ripples appear in the passband and stopband. The ideal response is often rectangular, and the corresponding IIR is a sinc function. If the window's main lobe is narrow, the composite frequency response remains close to that of the ideal IIR filter. ![]() Multiplying the infinite impulse by the window function in the time domain results in the frequency response of the IIR being convolved with the Fourier transform (or DTFT) of the window function. The result is a finite impulse response filter whose frequency response is modified from that of the IIR filter. In the window design method, one first designs an ideal IIR filter and then truncates the infinite impulse response by multiplying it with a finite length window function. Software packages such as MATLAB, GNU Octave, Scilab, and SciPy provide convenient ways to apply these different methods. The process is then repeated iteratively: the DFT is computed once again, correction applied in the frequency domain and so on. In the time-domain, only the first N coefficients are kept (the other coefficients are set to zero). In the Fourier domain, or DFT domain, the frequency response is corrected according to the desired specs, and the inverse DFT is then computed. The DFT of an initial filter design is computed using the FFT algorithm (if an initial estimate is not available, h=delta can be used). Equiripple FIR filters can be designed using the DFT algorithms as well.This method is particularly easy in practice since at least one text includes a program that takes the desired filter and N, and returns the optimum coefficients. Each unit delay is a z −1 operator in Z-transform notation.įor a causal discrete-time FIR filter of order N, each value of the output sequence is a weighted sum of the most recent input values : y = b 0 x b 1 x ⋯ b N x = ∑ i = 0 N b i ⋅ x, coefficients can be used. A lattice-form discrete-time FIR filter of order N. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |